<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: From iPhoto to Aperture</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sleepingmonkey.co.uk/2009/07/23/from-iphoto-to-aperture/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sleepingmonkey.co.uk/2009/07/23/from-iphoto-to-aperture/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 16:05:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Toni</title>
		<link>http://www.sleepingmonkey.co.uk/2009/07/23/from-iphoto-to-aperture/#comment-4155</link>
		<dc:creator>Toni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 11:48:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sleepingmonkey.co.uk/?p=600#comment-4155</guid>
		<description>Hi Ben,

a friend of mine from the blogosphere has recently been looking at both aperture and lightroom. He&#039;s an apple man through and through, so eventually picked aperture because it works like a Mac, rather than Lightroom, which works like an Adobe app for Windows. 

It was interesting because he found lightroom much more powerful than aperture, but couldn&#039;t come to terms with the appearance and workflow. He&#039;s not a professional either, but does take quite a lot of pics and is both a perfectionist and convinced the apple way is THE right way.

BTW I find your use of iPhoto interesting. It never occurred to me to use it to organise images (and I have most of mine on a PC anyway). But as a photo editor it seemed very frustrating, and I ended up using the GIMP in order to do quite basic manipulation. Maybe I should consider letting it hunt down and organise the images - assuming it will ever let me have control of them again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ben,</p>
<p>a friend of mine from the blogosphere has recently been looking at both aperture and lightroom. He&#8217;s an apple man through and through, so eventually picked aperture because it works like a Mac, rather than Lightroom, which works like an Adobe app for Windows. </p>
<p>It was interesting because he found lightroom much more powerful than aperture, but couldn&#8217;t come to terms with the appearance and workflow. He&#8217;s not a professional either, but does take quite a lot of pics and is both a perfectionist and convinced the apple way is THE right way.</p>
<p>BTW I find your use of iPhoto interesting. It never occurred to me to use it to organise images (and I have most of mine on a PC anyway). But as a photo editor it seemed very frustrating, and I ended up using the GIMP in order to do quite basic manipulation. Maybe I should consider letting it hunt down and organise the images &#8211; assuming it will ever let me have control of them again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
